![]() ![]() So, if you're working on a problem with others, make sure to get their input. Get input from others - Ishikawa diagrams are most effective when they're created by a team.For example, rather than writing "lack of training", you could write "employees not receiving sufficient training on the new software". Be specific - when you identify a cause, make sure it is as specific as possible.Remember, the aim is to help you focus on the most important causes of a problem. Keep it simple - don't try to include too many factors on your diagram.Top tips for getting the most out of Ishikawa diagrams Using a flow diagram may be more appropriate, particularly for processes that cross multiple teams or functions. The relationships between different causes can be difficult to identify.In this case you could use pareto analysis to identify the top 20% of causes for further analysis. There could be many causes for complex defects, which can make the diagram cluttered.When you need to identify all potential causes of a problem (in which case, a brainstorming session might be more appropriate).When the problem is very simple and there is only one possible cause. ![]() Here are some situations where it might not be the most appropriate: The Ishikawa diagram is not always the best tool for the job. When you need to make a decision about which solution to implement.When you need to brainstorm ideas for a new product or service.When you need to improve a process or product. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |